Other than stating that the blog post was highly editorialised, there was absolutely no indication given by whyenot about what Hawks biases might be.
To be honest, your comment reads strongly as though you are projecting.
To be honest, your comment reads strongly as though you are projecting.
Here's how a slightly more partisan biologist (Peter Frost) responds to the same material:
http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2011/07/arroseur-arrose.html
Here's the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html