DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google wanted to hide

Re:DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google w... by nuancebydefault on Saturday September 30, 2023 @04:57PM (#37719725)

Google is still reaping its fruits from the early 2000's investments in a new browser that was lightweight and stable but had powerful search and apps, unlike the default browser of MS. So at that point in time people deliberately installed chrome on their PC since the default did not fulfill their wishes.

That doesn't mean that people today are choosing chrome and google search, as they come by default on their smartphones. Most smartphone users don't even know that the browser and search engine can be changed rather easily.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google w... by peter422 on Saturday September 30, 2023 @08:26PM (#37721317)

Chrome is not the default on stock iPhone, Mac, Windows or Linux.

It’s only the default on Android.

Search engine is a different story but people like Google enough they’ll change to Google anyways no matter what the default is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google w... by Eisenstein on Saturday September 30, 2023 @08:45PM (#37721422)

Why don't you guys let the lawyers do the arguing for you. The great grandparent I was responding to was arguing against the ability of the state to even bring the lawsuit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google w... by scarface_74 on Sunday October 01, 2023 @12:23AM (#37722520)

Chrome was never “lightweight” and it was a fork of WebKit that has actually focused less and less on being “lightweight” since it created its own fork.

In the US, only 40% of buyers are buying Android phones. On desktops, Chrome also has a majority market share and 97% of desktops don’t come with Chrome as the default.

[ Parent | on HN ]