If you think that all systems need (or even should) be understandable before being widely deployed, I'd argue crypto is still simpler than what we already have.
In this way, what's sold as this regulatory and authority bucking system is not only not doing that at all, it's if anything, even EASIER for people who aren't you to see what you're doing. The only way to engage with any of these products and keep your anonymity is to do so basically with either your own code, or ways of accessing the chains that are HIGHLY technical.
So which is it? Is this trying to be the hobby horse of gambling-addicted tech bros, or is it a replacement financial system that enables transacting business without governmental or legal oversight? Because it can be one of these but it can't be both, and frankly, BOTH suck in their own ways.
I see this criticism often, usually leveled at either crypto or AI, even though literally everybody else does this too. Try reading a random excerpt of Intel's X86 architecture manual, the C++ language specification, or even a random physics paper off arXiv. If you're not well-versed in any of these subjects, you will probably understand very little.