News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted Online. Parent comment

Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by nodamage on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @08:06PM (#37683370)
> This is basically exactly what Microsoft was found guilty of in the late 90s: abusing their monopoly power in operating systems to advance their position in the Internet by making IE the default browser and insisting, despite all evidence to the contrary, that "The browser must be an integral part of the OS!"

Except that ruling was overturned on appeal so this was never actually found to be illegal.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by lmm on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @11:32PM (#37684886)
The ruling that ordering the breakup of Microsoft was an appropriate remedy was overturned. The finding that they were violating antitrust law was not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On... by nodamage on Thursday September 28, 2023 @02:27AM (#37686017)
It's complicated as there were many different claims made against Microsoft in the lawsuit, some were upheld on appeal and some were overturned. But the specific claim I was replying to (that bundling Internet Explorer with Windows violated antitrust law) was one of the ones overturned by the appeals court.
[ Parent | on HN ]