News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FTC Sues Amazon for Illegally Maintaining Monopoly Power by ToucanLoucan on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @09:02PM (#37668313)
Unscalable is not synonymous with hard for the vast majority of people. If you communicate confusingly, you'll be asked for clarifications. That's not nitpicking and you can avoid it by using words for what they're for.

> What you're missing are all of the thousands of people who try it and fail.

It's not easy or hard. It's lucky. It's getting your ad seen in the right place with the right audience and taking off with enough sharing to build virality. Then your store will do a brief burst of good business before you fall back into irrelevance and continue.

It's highly analogous to gold rushes. And then as now, the people who get reliably rich off gold rushes aren't mining gold, they're selling shovels and pickaxes, namely: hustle influencers, shopify, and indeed, Amazon.

> That's not just ordering shit from China. If it were, Amazon would do it themselves

Buy some Amazon Basics stuff and check where it's made, then get back to me.

> and cut out all of these middleman

Which is what they seem to be doing.

Like again, for emphasis: Amazon is not a good guy here. They are neutral, at best. But I have very low sympathy for people who build their entire way of life on one single platform that could at any moment tell them to kick rocks. It's bad when YouTubers do it, it's bad when instagram influencers do it, and it's bad here too. And all of these usually end in similar ways. You're only as good as your last post, your last sale, your last quarter of profits and if your and the platform's interests diverge enough, you'll be dropped like a flaming bag of dogshit.

Re:FTC Sues Amazon for Illegally Maintaining Monopoly Power by 22289d on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @09:18PM (#37668456)
> Unscalable is not synonymous with hard for the vast majority of people.

> It's not easy or hard. It's lucky.

Great, thank you for teaching me about the English language. None of this addresses a single thing about my point, it's just nitpicking my choice of words.

Use whateeeeeeeever words will make it through your compiler, insert those in place of mine - and that's what I meant.

> Buy some Amazon Basics stuff and check where it's made, then get back to me.

> Which is what they seem to be doing.

Nitpick 2, Electric Boogaloo. Now you have a problem with the way I've used some other words or the absence of some qualifiers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity

Re:FTC Sues Amazon for Illegally Maintaining Monopoly Power by ToucanLoucan on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @09:26PM (#37668531)
> Use whateeeeeeeever words will make it through your compiler, insert those in place of mine - and that's what I meant.

Until I do it incorrectly, and then I'm deliberately misconstruing your point into something you didn't say. Or if I do it in a way you feel makes you or your argument look stupid, at which point I'm arguing in bad faith.

No thanks. If you'd like to discuss things I'm happy to do that, that's why I'm here as Obi Wan says. But I'm not responsible for steel-manning your point for you because you lack vocabulary.

> Nitpick 2, Electric Boogaloo. Now you have a problem with the way I've used some other words or the absence of some qualifiers.

This is still not nitpicking. You have repeatedly put the notion of product acquisition on a pedestal, including the fact that pulling goods from China is this difficult, laborious task (which, it does take labor, that is true). But Amazon knows how to do that, it's basically how it became the retail juggernaut it is.

And that includes Amazon Basics products, which without even looking at one, I'd be willing to bet non-insubstantial amounts of money are manufactured mostly in China. That doesn't make them inherently bad: Chinese firms will make your products as good or as bad as you're willing to pay for.

Re:FTC Sues Amazon for Illegally Maintaining Monopoly Power by 22289d on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @09:32PM (#37668593)
> Until I do it incorrectly, and then I'm deliberately misconstruing your point into something you didn't say.

That's what you're doing now, aside from pretending it isn't deliberate.

I strongly suspect all of you are Amazon astroturphers, so I'm going to disengage now.