Re:GitHub Passkeys are generally available
by NoZebra120vClip on Monday September 25, 2023 @12:37PM
(#37646635)
They will turn our security keys into junk: https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/2023-02-02-how-hype-will-tu...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub Passkeys are generally available
by snuxoll on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:23PM
(#37647437)
Personally I think the rk requirement is just fine, the long-tail goal of Passkeys is to simply credential management for users and the UX of key wrapping stands in opposition of that.
Having a security key handle unlocking your platform authenticator/password manager seems to be the middle ground that's being driven towards, and as somebody with multiple YubiKey's I'm perfectly fine with it.
Re:GitHub Passkeys are generally available
by danieldk on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:29PM
(#37647531)
At the risk of setting up a straw man (but the sentiment of your comment seems negative), but should we slow down improved security for the a bunch of tech people who have hardware keys with a measly 20 or 32 slots?
Sure, authentication could also be done without resident keys, but resident keys simplify the authentication workflow a lot, since the relying party doesn't need some additional credentials to send the correct wrapped key.
(Disclaimer: I have several Yubikeys.)
Re:GitHub Passkeys are generally available
by yencabulator on Monday September 25, 2023 @09:08PM
(#37653020)
Interestingly, this link says
> [The definition "passkey is a resident key"] has become so invasive that even FIDO now use it as their definition.
but the linked FAQ for "their definition" doesn't contain the word "resident" (anymore?).