Re:LLMs trained on “A is B” fail to learn “B is A”
by rvz on Saturday September 23, 2023 @08:12AM
(#37622587)
Unfortunately both of you are being downvoted because what the OP said is the truth about these stochastic parroting systems, and the AI bros here are upset and are fiercely deflecting the findings in this paper.
> Of all the places on the Internet, this is where I expected to see most people with minimal AI knowledge.
It should be. However, you're not far from a ChatGPT wrapper project that needs to get enough hype and attention to get the VC funding they need to execute their side grift.
Any 'technologist' that knows beyond the basics of AI knowledge will find that they don't trust these LLMs since they can't reason or understand their outputs and just spit out nonsense. This paper shows it is not even comparable to humans. It is not the same thing either.
Only a matter of time to search for an adversarial prompt to confuse these systems reliably.
> Of all the places on the Internet, this is where I expected to see most people with minimal AI knowledge.
It should be. However, you're not far from a ChatGPT wrapper project that needs to get enough hype and attention to get the VC funding they need to execute their side grift.
Any 'technologist' that knows beyond the basics of AI knowledge will find that they don't trust these LLMs since they can't reason or understand their outputs and just spit out nonsense. This paper shows it is not even comparable to humans. It is not the same thing either.
Only a matter of time to search for an adversarial prompt to confuse these systems reliably.