News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died by Etherlord87 on Friday September 22, 2023 @07:03PM (#37618923)
Why do you put the burden of proof on me? You countered a usage of a word with a quote and no explanation. I took a wild guess on what you could possibly mean, and argue how that would be a non sequitur. If you make an actual argument I might agree, but it's not clear what your argument even is.
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died by catchnear4321 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @08:07AM (#37622532)
> It doesn’t mean it wasn’t “necessary.”

your guess seems anything but wild.

Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died by Etherlord87 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @12:59PM (#37625070)
You are forcing me to guess. Even after I wrote it's not clear what you tried to communicate, you didn't care to elaborate, instead you're trying to force me to provide definitions. That's a ridiculous way to argue.
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died by catchnear4321 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @04:28PM (#37627180)
the point was the word.

the interpretation is the conversation.

the argument is your construction. end it whenever you wish.