Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died
by Etherlord87 on Friday September 22, 2023 @07:03PM
(#37618923)
Why do you put the burden of proof on me? You countered a usage of a word with a quote and no explanation. I took a wild guess on what you could possibly mean, and argue how that would be a non sequitur. If you make an actual argument I might agree, but it's not clear what your argument even is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died
by catchnear4321 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @08:07AM
(#37622532)
> It doesn’t mean it wasn’t “necessary.”
your guess seems anything but wild.
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died
by Etherlord87 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @12:59PM
(#37625070)
You are forcing me to guess. Even after I wrote it's not clear what you tried to communicate, you didn't care to elaborate, instead you're trying to force me to provide definitions. That's a ridiculous way to argue.
Re:The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Died
by catchnear4321 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @04:28PM
(#37627180)
the point was the word.
the interpretation is the conversation.
the argument is your construction. end it whenever you wish.