Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by ThrowawayR2 on Thursday September 21, 2023 @02:26PM
(#37601824)
Considering how bad the state of software is, it's pretty obvious that we should have started paying for it long ago.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by CamperBob2 on Thursday September 21, 2023 @03:42PM
(#37603096)
My software works just fine, thanks.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by deciduously on Thursday September 21, 2023 @04:53PM
(#37604151)
So says every dev who introduces a memory safety bug.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by bioneuralnet on Thursday September 21, 2023 @02:11PM
(#37601599)
True, but we're already paying for not having it.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by insanitybit on Thursday September 21, 2023 @02:44PM
(#37602121)
As opposed to right now where our users pay for it.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by stouset on Thursday September 21, 2023 @02:50PM
(#37602200)
We are already paying for it.
This is the same argument against universal healthcare: “oh but look how much it will cost”. Yeah, it’s a lot. It’s also less than the price tag of the current system.
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by halJordan on Thursday September 21, 2023 @03:09PM
(#37602527)
And you think that youre immune to the cost increases Clorox or Colonial Pipelines pass along so they can pay their literal ransoms?
Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So...
by CamperBob2 on Thursday September 21, 2023 @03:38PM
(#37603024)
Compared to paying $10,000 for a Windows license, yeah, I'm pretty much immune.
You people literally do not know what you're asking for, and you don't understand what would happen if you received it. When you stand on the shoulders of giants, it's bad form to kick the ladder away.
As long as you understand who will pay for it: you. Along with the rest of us.