The confusion is that the order of the key and value can be reversed, and commas are optional, so there's no way to tell at a glance what e.g. the value associated with:bar is.
>the order of the key and value can be reversed
This is the case with any hash-map in any language, modulo some of them making certain keys illegal.
But "string":"string" can be reversed in pretty much any language's hash-map.
>here's no way to tell at a glance what e.g. the value associated with:bar is.
You've certainly constructed and formatted a hash-map that is a little tricky to understand, but 1> this combination of key and value types is going to be pretty rare in the wild and 2> to the extent it exists, people would format it to be easier to parse, either by adding commas or newlines.
Re:XML is better than YAML
by dekelpilli on Saturday September 23, 2023 @08:45AM
(#37622766)
> the order of the key and value can be reversed
That's not true. What you're seeing here is a map where [1 2 3] is the key for the value :baz
Fixed link to that style guide entry: https://guide.clojure.style/#opt-commas-in-map-literals
Per that style guide, the above map should be formatted like this:
{:a 1
2 :bar
[1 2 3] :baz}
Most maps written in EDN have keys of a consistent type. A map whose keys are consistently keywords would look like this when formatted: {:a [1 2]
:bar "https://example.com/"
:baz [1 2 3]}
HN comment formatting help: https://news.ycombinator.com/formatdoc. I indented the above code by two spaces.
[0] https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide#opt-commas-in...