News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tracing: Structured Logging, but better in every way. Parent comment

Re:Tracing: Structured Logging, but better in every way by _moog on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @07:20PM (#37591339)
> Newer tools/companies have a different approach that makes cost far more predictable and generally lower.

What newer tools/companies are in this category? Any that you recommend?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tracing: Structured Logging, but better in every way by hooverd on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @08:51PM (#37591970)
I haven't used anything else, but I'll gladly shill for https://honeycomb.io.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tracing: Structured Logging, but better in every way by makeavish on Thursday September 21, 2023 @01:09AM (#37593429)
Companies like https://signoz.io/ are Opentelemetry native and have very transparent approach to predictable pricing. You can self host easily as well.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tracing: Structured Logging, but better in every way by mikeshi42 on Thursday September 21, 2023 @03:54AM (#37594513)
I think we fit in that bucket [1] - open source, self-hostable, based on OpenTelemetry and backed by Clickhouse DB (columnar, not time-series).

Clickhouse gives users much greater flexibility in tradeoffs than either a time-series or inverted-index based store could offer (along with S3 support). There's nothing like a system that can balance high performance AND (usable) high cardinality.

[1] https://github.com/hyperdxio/hyperdx

disclaimer (in case anyone just skimmed): I'm one of the authors of HyperDX

[ Parent | on HN ]