News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Svelte 5: Runes. Parent comment

Re:Svelte 5: Runes by ttfkam on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @12:32PM (#37586296)
But have you used 2-way binding with a more modern framework? Or are you still hanging on to your experience with a defunct framework like Knockout from over a decade ago?

And don't get me started on React's "put all the logic you want in our templating language that doesn't even target HTML5" elephant-footgun. Oh! Sorry! Forgot that React's footguns are aKeats elegant and reasonable while everything else's footguns are dealbreakers.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Svelte 5: Runes by RussianCow on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @02:50PM (#37588343)
> And don't get me started on React's "put all the logic you want in our templating language that doesn't even target HTML5" elephant-footgun.

Sorry, but how is JSX a footgun? I have a lot of issues with React, but JSX doesn't even come close to making the list.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Svelte 5: Runes by ttfkam on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @03:27PM (#37588838)
You obviously keep the amount of JS logic to a minimum in your templates. I have encountered many React codebases that did not do this.
[ Parent | on HN ]