Re:Add extra stuff to a “standard” encoding? Sure, why not
by bobmcn on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @11:44AM
(#37585651)
Why not just define a higher level proto that contains all possible (maybe repeated) protos you might want to include? Then if one of the included protos is not present, the higher level proto will efficiently encode that, and nothing gets broken.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.