News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Svelte 5: Runes by satvikpendem on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @11:00AM (#37585065)
> * But I do find it pretty weird that this convergence is happening. Initially I thought it was diverging with svelte but it seems to be reserving direction.*

Convergent evolution [0]. Just as a shark, dolphin, and ichthyosaur all have the same body shape which is efficient for swimming and hunting in the water, so too do technologies converge when the problems are all the same and the solutions are understood, only as humans we can learn from each other rather than randomly mutating our codebases [1]. It's the same reason why we see a lot of languages starting to adopt more functional features such as not using `null` and having exhaustive pattern matching, such as Rust (from OCaml), Dart 3, recent versions of Java, etc.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_programming

Re:Svelte 5: Runes by dleeftink on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @11:54AM (#37585766)
But for every similar shaped organism, there exist as many, if not more dissimilar ones, either alive or preceding. Convergence is not a given, and for every instance of convergence there are just as many divergences, even when appearing similar on the surface. For each degree of software 'carcinization' [1], I'd contend there are as many evolutionary offshoots going against the grain.

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinisation

Re:Svelte 5: Runes by satvikpendem on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @12:02PM (#37585872)
That's true, but perhaps just like in biological evolution, the ones that are against the grain don't survive, for whatever reason. So it could even be that convergence occurs via selection.