Re:SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up w...
by lukev on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @06:07PM
(#37577580)
Also, Musk yanking the plug on an active operation does not bode well for that sort of use case.
Re:SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up w...
by dsabanin on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @11:39PM
(#37580125)
That can be solved by legislation if necessary.
Re:SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up w...
by rlt on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:49PM
(#37589972)
Except that’s not what happened. Starlink was not active in Crimea at the time because the US had sanctions in Crimea. He got a request from the Ukrainian government. He has stated if he got a request from the US government he would have activated it.
Re:SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up w...
by serf on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @07:03PM
(#37578281)
2500+250/mo is steep for the marine use device , especially when a lot of emergency-use data equivalents will charge you by the byte -- which makes the devices make good sense to have aboard but never used.
I know of a lot of mariners that would probably bite at Starlink if an equivalent pay-as-you-need service was offered,even with the pricey equipment.
Re:SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up w...
by inemesitaffia on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:35PM
(#37589805)
Starlink has what you speak of
In every instance where Starlink could be more usable than terrestrial we're talking a few million at most.