You've misunderstood my point - I'm not saying he's trustworthy. I'm saying deciding whether or not he's trustworthy isn't such a black-and-white issue, and that I'm surprised at how black-and-white so many people are trying to make it. What if reality is more complicated and we're filtering out valuable information? What if he's not completely wrong, nor completely right? Just surprised at a lack of willingness to consider the grey areas.