Re:Japan's Hometown Tax
by emodendroket on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @01:55AM
(#37566047)
If that’s the goal of the policy then it would make a lot more sense to develop second- or third-tier cities (Sapporo, for instance) and encourage people to set up businesses, live, and work there, not ship funds to dying little podunk towns.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Japan's Hometown Tax
by midoridensha on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @02:19AM
(#37566213)
Maybe, but the "podunk" towns are frequently where a lot of the produce comes from. I imagine no one is growing watermelons or tea in a second-tier city.
Besides, they are encouraging people to move to those second- and third-tier cities. There's various initiatives for that.
Re:Japan's Hometown Tax
by emodendroket on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @10:18AM
(#37570317)
People grow produce around Haneda airport so your imagination may be flawed, but either way, an agricultural economy, while important in its own way, is not going to slow population loss to the cities.
> People grow produce around Haneda airport
No they don't. The part that's not ocean is an industrial wasteland; if you did manage to grow anything it would likely be too full of heavy metals to safely eat. You're probably thinking of Narita, which despite billing itself as "Tokyo" is 50km the other side of the prefectural border.
Re:Japan's Hometown Tax
by midoridensha on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @10:34PM
(#37579803)
Not disagreeing (I'm sure you're right that he's thinking of NRT), but theoretically, you could grow stuff in an industrial wasteland without it being contaminated: you could build hydroponic facilities or some other buildings, ship clean soil in (for raised planting beds for instance), and grow things there. Just don't use the soil in the ground.
I imagine it's just not worth it to go to this trouble to grow things on contaminated former-industrial land.