Re:Wasmer – Run, Publish and Deploy any code, anywhere
by syrusakbary on Monday September 18, 2023 @01:01PM
(#37558807)
While I respect their point of view, I do not agree that banning bounties in OSS projects is the right way of approaching it, and as such we haven't complied to it. Specially since this is a bounty for a real need that we have at Wasmer.
Furthermore, we also took their post constructively and added two more points on the bounty issue [1] that we believe should solve most of their concerns:
* Wasmer will manage the work and have at most one person or team working on it at a time. Anyone interested on the work should reply here and organization of the work will be done by the Wasmer team
* Partial work that actually works will be rewarded accordingly (for example, the libc layer, or the Zig layer itself)
Of course, the fact that they banned any further conversation from the disagreement doesn't make specially easy to see if such an approach will be sufficient for them or not.
[1] https://github.com/wasmerio/wasmer/issues/4218#issuecomment-...
Re:Wasmer – Run, Publish and Deploy any code, anywhere
by rishav_sharan on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @02:12PM
(#37573890)
Isn't that how oss works? You should be able to add bounties to your fork. Then zig team can choose not to merge these if they want.
> Please don’t use bounties to incentivize Zig development.
They explained their reasoning extensively:
You responded by moving the request to your own repo, with the following disclaimer [1]:> Info: while ideally the PR should be merged into Zig master, is not a necessary requirement to receive the bounty. As long as a fork exists that fulfills the requirements laid out before, the bounty will be awarded
To an outsider, this looks like you slapped a new name on the exact thing the Zig team asked you to stop.
Do you feel your new request adaquately addresses the team's issues?
[0] https://ziglang.org/news/bounties-damage-open-source-project...
[1] https://github.com/wasmerio/wasmer/issues/4218