Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by AuryGlenz on Saturday September 16, 2023 @08:48PM (#37540383)

I also have a 3080, and there’s no way SD is faster. The best comparison as far as resolution is SDXL and in the time it takes me to generate one image at a reasonable amount of steps Adobe generates 3 options.

This is referring to the Photoshop stuff, which is way better than any type of SD inpainting for removing things from images. Firefly might be slower? I haven’t used it since it first came out.

I agree for just general image generation SD or Midjourney are better options in their own way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by gmerc on Sunday September 17, 2023 @03:24AM (#37542407)

SDXL, 3090, 22its/s 4090, 34its/s

xformers, 1024x1024x diffuser pipeline.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by AuryGlenz on Sunday September 17, 2023 @09:21PM (#37551119)

I kind of doubt those numbers, considering my 12GB 3080 gets something like 3 it/s in ComfyUI - though I suppose that's usually with a LoRA. Even if they're accurate, very few people have a 3090/4090. Keep in mind the Photoshop version would have something akin to Controlnet going on as well, which would slow things down.

[ Parent | on HN ]