my first reaction is that the author is a student of religion, and gives voice to religious thought. This alone is a large contrast to many non-religious or even religious-hostile comments here on YNews

second note is that "voice" is not an accidental word.. it is literally human sound, in religious context, to others who understand it that way.. In my view, religion is significant, is not "fake", does provide meaningful ways to see the world and is relevent to human coping and human discovery. The sounds of voice giving names to change, threats, adversity, some-definition of Evil, etc.. do matter in my view and also the view of Haberman. So I chose to amplify that voice with a comment here, to draw attention to the work, its inquiry, its contents and the value system that is related to those..