Re:Fed Pledges Top $7.4 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit
by Retric on Tuesday November 25, 2008 @11:58AM
(#376512)
"the average family spent around 20 percent of their rebate in the first month after receipt." Which is not to say the rest was saved for the long term.
"Low wealth households households that reported not having at least two months in savings in case of an emergency also raised their spending more than the average household when the rebate arrived."
"Our findings underscore the potency of the economic stimulus payments in stabilizing consumer spending during recessions."
This would suggest a trickle up vs trickle down economy where a stimulus package targeted at poor people would have the greatest impact.
PS: Poor people spend more of their money than rich people film at 11.
Re:Fed Pledges Top $7.4 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit
by create_account on Wednesday November 26, 2008 @10:59AM
(#377707)
Poor people spend more of their money than rich people film at 11
Yeah, duh, but even if you gave poor people $20,000 and they spend it all, how does it do anything about the housing crisis?
Without lending, that $20,000 won't change the market at all.
That was the assumption behind the last stimulus plan, too, but it turns out only 10% to 20% of it was actually spent (http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/WSJ-2008Sti...)
Even if people did spend the $10k you'd like to give them, it wouldn't make a dent in terms of home or auto sales unless there was financing available, too.