That's not the point of the justice system. Justice is not about retribution, justice within criminal contexts is about punishments within the realm of what is good. Punishing someone for past behavior that serves not future purpose is retribution. The justice system needs to be changed if it's about tick for tack.

For example, we don't need to give somebody a life-long sentence for a crime that they're obviously and apparently not going to repeat again. We have to take into consideration relative changes.

An obvious example here is the ongoing case with Danny Masterson, a crime that was committed 20 years. He's now a family man and a father. It makes no sense to give him 30 year in prison. That is just cruel. Our justice system has failed, not only him, but also his family - like his daughter, who will now grow up without a father. What good does that do???

We have to become forgiving and tolerant as a society, things are becoming desperate.

You do know that corporations are not people? Right?

Obviously. That doesn't mean its good to drive our companies into the dirt, just because they're not people. People depend on them. People work for these companies. Their significance is perhaps far greater than actually ruining just the lives of one person.

Our companies? TikTok is Chinese... That being said, I do not consider jobs or companies benefits a valid argument when it comes to anti trust and regulations.

But you sure know capitalism, and corporations, abuse the goodwill of hoverents, local and national, and communities. You just want to be ultra edgy for some reason.

> our companies

Oh ho ho ho. Now your comments ITT suddenly make sense.