News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Willingham Sends Fables into the Public Domain by bmacho on Friday September 15, 2023 @09:38AM (#37522742)
> Hey, indie band that still scrapes by on royalties and touring? The minute your best-selling album is 10 years old, it's going to be repackaged and sold without you seeing a dime.

Yes, indeed. Will it be harder for indie bands? I don't think so. Will it be different? Sure. Will it be better for the society if you could have live concerts or disco parties with great songs? Absolutely.

Re:Willingham Sends Fables into the Public Domain by mbreese on Friday September 15, 2023 @10:19AM (#37523348)
> bands play each others songs without asking

Live performances are a different act than recording and selling albums. Live performances are always (?) allowed, but IIRC, the songwriter/composer is due a royalty.

How often that happens in real life is a question, but live performances (currently) have a different set of rules.

Re:Willingham Sends Fables into the Public Domain by jzb on Friday September 15, 2023 @10:49AM (#37523912)
Have you asked indie bands? Cause... I'm skeptical they're going to be happy with your proposals given that they're already hanging by a pretty thin thread.

Playing songs live != repackaging recordings. Not even in the same ballpark. Venues of size pay licenses to ASCAP, etc. for the rights to let cover bands do this -- but it's also a usage that requires a lot more factors than just copying the song. At least in the U.S. these uses are pretty much automated vs. negotiating rights to reproduce a full album or even a single.

(Tribute bands are another animal entirely - I'm not sure how or if the various Pink Floyd tribute bands, for instance, negotiate deals with the original bands since they're not just covering the songs - they also get into likeness rights and trademark, etc.)

Re:Willingham Sends Fables into the Public Domain by posix86 on Saturday September 16, 2023 @01:14AM (#37532231)
It might improve thr situation a lot for Spotify etc. because without a legal instrument determining ownership, they might just let the first poster of a song be the owner of a song - which means anyone tries to post their song asap, even if they don't believe in Spotify.