Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-...
by rsynnott on Thursday September 14, 2023 @08:20AM
(#37507937)
So, the alternative would have been that they'd have to produce a new SoC. This would add cost (both the upfront development cost, and costs relating to the inevitable waste of the old chip). This cost would be absorbed via either lower margins (good luck with that, it's Apple we're talking about) or higher cost device. Approximately ten users would ever notice the difference.
I think Apple made the obviously sensible decision here.
I think Apple made the obviously sensible decision here.