News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries by netsharc on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @04:30PM (#37501331)
Ha, good point, let's not focus on the main issue and instead argue semantics shall we... /s

To ELI5 like you seem to prefer, the iceberg breaching the hull of the Titanic seems like a critical transgression, but the ship stayed afloat another hour or so...

Re:Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries by diogenes4 on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @04:32PM (#37501365)
If the main issue is not semantic, how would you characterize it?
Re:Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries by scrozier on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @04:46PM (#37501512)
They are not arguing semantics, they are getting to the very premise/context of the paper.