> TOML could be extended to support it.
Seems doubtful as that's specifically something TOML was created not to support. If you want unityped ini files you can define that dialect of ini files.
Seems doubtful as that's specifically something TOML was created not to support. If you want unityped ini files you can define that dialect of ini files.
That said, YAML's syntax is very weird. YAML just sucks. And any such implementation must necessarily be unityped (up to the point where the data is coerced into the configuration structure at your program) and completely preserve the original data.
TOML could be extended to support it. I don't think it's "tasteful", but I see no practical problems with it.