Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus
by UweSchmidt on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @07:11AM
(#37495161)
If there are no major innovations possible for a product, it should be a lower-priced, long-lasting commodity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus
by BossingAround on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @07:15AM
(#37495191)
Says you, not Apple. The market seems to agree with Apple.
It would only be priced as a commodity if it can be easily replicated as a commodity by 3rd parties.
Even without fresh innovations if the competition can't produce a product of equal quality it will still hold its value in the market place.
Android phones are a lower-priced commodity. Apple products are luxury goods, like designer shoes or prestige cars. Apple will sell you last year's iPhone at a discount, but only on the clear understanding that it is visibly a cheap, old iPhone. If the basic form factor doesn't change between generations, you can guarantee that the color will.
Apple's profits clearly vindicate this as a business strategy.
iPhones used to be Veblyn goods not sure if they are any more.
Definitely not a commodity. Commodities are raw inputs and have no discerning characteristics. Even washing machines that have been around for half a century aren't considered commodities.