I don't agree with your absolutism here. Not knowing things doesn't mean everything is on equal footing.

All I'm saying in this thread is that, when comparing possible theories, the ones that do not violate general relativity while explaining other observations IMO deserve not to be dismissed just because people cannot wrap their heads around non-physical consequences of the theory.

Okay but also if they do violate GR that doesn't really tell us much either, since we expect QM to not obey the rules of GR