Rust has exceptions. They are used throughout the standard libraries to report some errors, and as far as I can tell, they are deeply ingrained into the default testing framework.

As a rule of thumb, languages that loudly claim not to have exceptions actually use them in some way (see POSIX C, Perl, Go).

Saying that Rust "has exceptions" is dishonest. What matters isn't whether they technically exist, but if and how they're used.

In idiomatically written Rust you will never obtain an exception/panic (unless there is a bug), and exceptions are not used for control flow. This is not the case in Java or C++ or many other languages.

I don't know. It seems fairly common to use std::panic::catch_unwind as a top-level error handler. compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs has this:

    /// The compiler currently unwinds with a special sentinel value to abort
    /// compilation on fatal errors. This function catches that sentinel and turns
    /// the panic into a `Result` instead.

That's clearly using unwinding as a control flow primitive.

There's another example in src/tools/rustfmt/src/lib.rs, in format_snippet, where panics apparently are just suppressed.

I expect application servers for Rust to handle panics in a similar way: abort a specific request, but not terminate the whole process.

In JRE terms, Rust doesn't have Exceptions, but it has Errors.