News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Earth had hottest 3-months on record; unprecedented sea t... by jfengel on Sunday September 10, 2023 @11:58AM (#37457071)
You could take a boat. It takes longer but you said it's not an emergency.
Re:Earth had hottest 3-months on record; unprecedented sea t... by replygirl on Sunday September 10, 2023 @12:37PM (#37457498)
yeah i'd love if ocean liners were a thing again. afaik there's only one, and it's a ritzy and touristy affair
Re:Earth had hottest 3-months on record; unprecedented sea t... by Gareth321 on Sunday September 10, 2023 @12:54PM (#37457671)
Re:Earth had hottest 3-months on record; unprecedented sea t... by replygirl on Sunday September 10, 2023 @01:36PM (#37458076)
in this theoretical world without commodity air travel, we'd have ocean liners fit for purpose. right now the only one i know of is effectively a cruise ship payload stuffed into an ocean liner hull. based on the numbers for cargo favoring sea over air, it seems reasonable that liners _could_ be more efficient than flight
Re:Earth had hottest 3-months on record; unprecedented sea t... by concordDance on Sunday September 10, 2023 @04:56PM (#37459996)
The huge amount of time saved with plane vs boat makes the former the superior option. There's no way a ton of CO2 is worth the comparative QALY loss you get from five days in a boat compared to the other things you could be doing with that time (if you're on a properly efficient liner rather than a super inefficient modern luxury cruise liner). Even the extreme upper end of CO2 externalities don't go above $1000/ton with most reasonable estimates below $100/ton.