I think people are merely asking for evidence. Show a pattern of accounts that were banned for saying "COVID is airborne" and messages from the mods/admins stating that this was the actual reason, and the ban wasn't for general bad/belligerent conduct. Heck, show one solid example and we can talk...

Not really well said. More conspiratorial thinking that relies on this vague narrative boogeyman. Oooohhh, The Narrative! So scary... around every corner, waiting in the shadows to pounce! Beware of the dastardly narrative.

When there's a deadly virus spreading around, I'm not worried about The Narrative. I'm worried about dying. If the consensus is that rubbing my belly and tapping my head at the same time is going to keep me healthy, that's what I'm going to do. I'm not going to automatically reach for the "Well, that's just the narrative that the Belly Rubbing Head Tapping Illuminati WANTS you to think!" line of reasoning.

> I'm not worried about The Narrative. I'm worried about dying.

The narrative was to implement mitigations that could not be effective against an airborne virus, like wiping down surfaces, staying six feet apart and washing hands.

They pushed disposable masks that weren't capable of filtering the air you breathe instead of the bare minimum of a properly fitted N95 mask which can filter the air as long as it's fitted tightly enough to your face to prevent air leakage around the sides.

The false narrative that was put in place did result in more deaths than mitigations effective against an airborne virus would be.

If you are worried about dying, you should definitely be concerned about the government suppressing “misinformation” that turns out to be true, which could have shaped policy and individual choices early in the pandemic.

I don't mean dox yourself.

I mean if that was happening on a reasonable scale then there would be stories about it.

There were many stories about disagreements.

There were stories about subtle disagreements leading to bans.

I am just saying "if people got banned en mass for saying aerosol where is the proof".

I don't like anecdotes because people interpret their words by intent and so will assume what they meant to say is why they were punished.

"I don't know why there is a mask mandate it is completely ineffective" as a hypothetical. Is that someone saying that aerosol viruses need more effective masks? I could see someone claiming that.

Is that what they wrote? Not at all.

Moderation tends to be context free and unless people are willing to do a similar mental process they won't necessarily know why they got banned.

I don't think the poster above should do that analysis. I think feeling betrayed and wanting to leave when it happens is a perfectly reasonable response from them.

I just don't plan on listening to anecdotal evidence of bans from individuals on that kind of thing.