Genuine question, does this applies even when they are “white” (Caucasian white)? Why is that or is there a subtext I am missing?
When people actually discuss the advantages of diversity in the workplace, the advantages exist due to actual diversity, not just “a non-white-male voice”.
You’ll no doubt cite some extreme view or vocal minority to justify making this assumption, but it is not what most people mean most of the time. You’re painting a false reality which I’ve got no doubt creates a feedback loop leaving you seething.
My friend was filling a technical role and he had to turn down fitting white male candidates and hire technically inferior one just to satisfy diversification. It's not about ideology, it's about pathology that diversification creates in some cases.
I remember a body shop in Austin that recently made it into the news for allegedly putting up an ad for a white people only job linked to Berkshire.
Everyone there looked from the Indian subcontinent. The board had Middle eastern and black people.
No visibly Hispanic or White people or Black people among the rank and file in an Austin company.
Stop the pretence please.
Yes.
That's how a company without white people in Vermont can claim it's diverse.
Same with women only companies.