Re:Julia and Mojo (Modular) Mandelbrot Benchmark
by sundarurfriend on Saturday September 09, 2023 @05:28AM
(#37443591)
FWIW, the core Julia developers seem to be taking this more and more seriously, and AoT compilation to small binaries seems more of a "when" question than an "if" at this point. Open source development - without multi-million dollar support from outside - is unpredictable, but I wouldn't be surprised if a year from now, writing a restricted subset of Julia allowed you AoT compilation to reasonable binaries (and not something as restricted as StaticCompiler.jl requires, just avoiding some of the extreme dynamic features).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Julia and Mojo (Modular) Mandelbrot Benchmark
by baggepinnen on Saturday September 09, 2023 @07:10AM
(#37444057)
You mean investment like this?
https://info.juliahub.com/juliahub-receives-13-million-strat...
You can imagine what a company like Boeing might be interested in when it comes to a programming language.
Re:Julia and Mojo (Modular) Mandelbrot Benchmark
by sundarurfriend on Saturday September 09, 2023 @08:15AM
(#37444439)
Boeing is probably interested in Julia for manufacturing optimization, so their interest is likely in improving the optimization ecosystem around JuMP [1], Optim [2], etc., and compiler improvements related to that.
But we can only guess from the outside, and it's ultimately upto JuliaHub to decide how to spend the money, so I'll cross my fingers and hope that this gets us AoT static compilation sooner!
[1] https://jump.dev/ [2] https://julianlsolvers.github.io/Optim.jl/stable/
Re:Julia and Mojo (Modular) Mandelbrot Benchmark
by Max-Limelihood on Saturday September 09, 2023 @10:59PM
(#37452509)
13 million is substantial but not even close to the 100 million Modular got. Which really makes me wonder what Modular has been doing with that money, if they're still getting beat in benchmarks like this...