News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notes from UPenn's Forum on Brogramming and Sexism in Com... by redthrowaway on Friday March 23, 2012 @02:38AM (#3743977)
Nope. I will, entirely unironically, draw from a recent reddit post on this:

"Announcing 'I'm offended' is basically telling the world you can't control your emotions, so everyone else should do it for you."[1]

There are legitimate sources of offense, but "bro, you're totally harshing on frats" is not one of them.

[1]http://i.imgur.com/LQGwx.png

Re:Notes from UPenn's Forum on Brogramming and Sexism in Com... by ckwang on Friday March 23, 2012 @03:33AM (#3744106)
I'm curious as to why you feel that way. Why is "harshing on frats" as you put it not a negative act? Also, how does the reddit post not apply to the original issue here?
Re:Notes from UPenn's Forum on Brogramming and Sexism in Com... by redthrowaway on Friday March 23, 2012 @03:51AM (#3744134)
Because frats are not a put upon minority, or any segment of society that deserves our contrition and respect. They're drunken twenty-something white guys whose primary concern is how to be drunker and whiter and twenty-somethinger. They are an outgrowth of an otherwise useful function (university), not useful in and of themselves.

The reddit post is applicable because it is a rejoinder to those who claim offense at that which cannot reasonably be claimed to cause real offense to those for whom such a thing matters.

Re:Notes from UPenn's Forum on Brogramming and Sexism in Com... by delinka on Friday March 23, 2012 @10:33AM (#3745315)
How do you not see the irony here?

"They're drunken twenty-something white guys whose primary concern is..." <--- Stereotyping. Generalizations. Right here. In your comment.

There are fraternities and sororities whose members are not all "twenty-something white guys" and whose efforts are worthwhile. Do a smattering of research and you'll discover this.