News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI-generated child sex imagery has every US Attorney Gene... by dudul on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @09:11PM (#37413543)
I actually agree with that. To me it looks like a "crime" without victims.

Yeah it is disgusting, but who is suffering or being molested or abused here?

Re:AI-generated child sex imagery has every US Attorney Gene... by Sal0xFF on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @10:06PM (#37413854)
I agree there's no victims. Just like a drunk driver who drives from point A to point B without killing anyone or causing any damage. There's laws in place to prevent that behavior though. If a cop pulls you over for a broken tail light, you bet he's going to arrest you if you're under the influence -- to prevent bad outcomes. There's an attempt to squash these behaviors through punishment with jail time, reputation, and financial costs. Maybe some rehabilitation with AA. I think the same should be placed on this too. It's a slippery slope as a society if we let this slide.
Re:AI-generated child sex imagery has every US Attorney Gene... by madhatter999 on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @10:42PM (#37414115)
Now if you were drunk while playing Need for Speed, that wouldn’t be a problem because there is no “real” humans being endangered by your actions.
Re:AI-generated child sex imagery has every US Attorney Gene... by Turskarama on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @10:58PM (#37414233)
> Just like a drunk driver who drives from point A to point B without killing anyone or causing any damage

I don't think this is a good analogy. There's strong evidence that drink driving increases the risk of accidents, which is why it's illegal. Child porn is illegal because children are harmed to make it. It's _possible_ that the existence of child porn increases the chance of a pedophile acting on their urges, but if there is I don't know of any studies. An analogous (and more ethical) study might be whether or not people have more sex in places where pornography is easily accessible, but I have my doubts. It's well documented that young people are having less sex in general than previous generations and porn is more accessible than it's ever been, so if anything it appears the correlation might go the other way.

EDIT: I think the other far more compelling argument is that allowing any child sex images to exist at all normalizes it, and could make people consider it less harmful. Could it increase the rates in which people who are otherwise not pedophiles abuse children? I don't know the answer but it seems like a question worth asking.

Re:AI-generated child sex imagery has every US Attorney Gene... by Jigsy on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @10:08PM (#37413866)
Obviously if it's using actual CSAM then the image in question should be illegal, but that sounds like something that would already covered under existing laws anyway.