News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What OpenAI Really Wants by dgacmu on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @04:15PM (#37410680)
It's not just about the model, it's about the integration. Copilot is easy to use because it's basically automatic in vscode. So it isn't a 'flow breaker'. That is in some ways its primary benefit: it gives you something similar to searching for the solution a problem without having to leave the editor. (At the loss of being able to see the context of where the solution comes from, of course.)
Re:What OpenAI Really Wants by RC_ITR on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @05:36PM (#37411695)
This is a thread about hallucinations.

>ChatGPT craze has wore off for me, because of constant hallucinations when you ask for something slightly more esoterical. And I can't justify paying 20$ for GPT-4 to have more convincing hallucinations

Integration has nothing to do with hallucinations.

Re:What OpenAI Really Wants by dgacmu on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @07:29PM (#37412801)
Your response and the person you responded to were discussing copilot vs chatgpt. Both may "hallucinate". Copilot is more useful (to the GP and to me) - it's domain specific and well integrated, despite occasionally producing pure crap.

I also pay for copilot and don't for chatGPT.

Re:What OpenAI Really Wants by RC_ITR on Monday September 11, 2023 @05:25PM (#37473934)
Yes, we were discussing Copilot and ChatGPT, two products run on essentially the same model with no clear difference in their ability to hallucinate (or not).