Tampering. You may not remove or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in engines/equipment in compliance with the regulations prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/part-1068/section-1068...
It seems primarily about bypassing or disabling emission controls, not user controlled fuel mapping, or mods like putting in a performance air filter or exhaust. But EPA does consider a flex fuel conversion tampering.
https://afdc.energy.gov/bulletins/technology_bulletin_0807.h...
With a relevant paragraph on page 2
The site you linked mentions the carve out that the EPA has, but note that it requires both retaining or beating original behavior and requires extensive prod of that fact. A similar law affecting phone home circuits would almost certainly not find disabling the ability to phone home as in compliance.
They just got a $10M civil judgement against a couple "diesel tuners" here in Michigan:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-awards-10-milli...
https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-and-com...
but yeah, this is civil action against vendors, not anything that police will fine people for on the side of the road.
Can you cite the law? I know the EPA has civilly pursues companies that make products that bypass emission controls. But haven’t seen or heard anything that goes as fat as you suggest.
E.g.: https://www.dinancars.com/products/software-tuning/engine-tu...
This allows you to change the engine programming on a BMW. They do note it is not legal in California.