Re:Why Meta’s Yann LeCun isn’t buying the AI doomer narrative
by reducesuffering on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @10:51AM
(#37406028)
> low quality
> antagonism
> change your handle
Pot meet kettle
Do you personally find yourself suffering because of this comment chain?
I find myself in the school of prioritizing serious matters like homelessness, loneliness, destitution, slavery, truth, and averting death, when weighing against someone falsely claiming any amount of real suffering from an internet comment.
Btw you should seriously consider the opinions of Hofstadter, Bengio, Hinton, many other preeminent scientists, and spend time figuring out why they think this way. There’s scenarios where a lot of unnecessary suffering comes if people don’t think it’s a catastrophic danger and try averting it.
Re:Why Meta’s Yann LeCun isn’t buying the AI doomer narrative
by verdverm on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @04:07PM
(#37410577)
ok doomer...
review your comment history and see how your takes have fared
Re:Why Meta’s Yann LeCun isn’t buying the AI doomer narrative
by reducesuffering on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @06:33PM
(#37412332)
With net positive upvotes? Are you really making an appeal to popularity, anyway? You realize this place mostly laughed at OpenAI about AGI for years until ChatGPT came out. They were popularly wrong. Time will tell, you're just here: https://twitter.com/kristjanmoore/status/1663860424100413440
fyi, your comment is super low quality and on the line of antagonism, ironic given your HN handle would make one think you would not impose unnecessary suffering (by deriding something someone said)
---
edit, your comment history is quite telling, I would change my HN handle if I were you