Re:Learn Physics with Functional Programming
by Tainnor on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @06:27PM
(#37412267)
> parts of the 1000 page one that couple did like 6 years ago.
IMHO that book is bloated and overrated. Maybe it works for some people, but I find the explanations really weird and some of the exercises are just useless busywork without a point.
There are good parts in there (they do try to teach you how to properly think about types which is nice) but I really feel like you don't need to read 1000 pages to learn basic Haskell.
Re:Learn Physics with Functional Programming
by 7thaccount on Thursday September 07, 2023 @01:41PM
(#37422679)
Fine. I also read Learn You a Haskell, the O'Reilly one and a myriad of other sources. In comparison, Python was a cake walk.
Your mileage will vary of course. This was just my experience. I know Haskell is powerful, but it wasn't right for me. I haven't met a scripting language I didn't like yet though, so perhaps my neurons are just wired for that now. I do enjoy the random APL or Forth problem though and I'm decent at SQL after using it often for a decade.