Re:Wage transparency: Everyone’s happy except HR?
by fnordpiglet on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @10:35PM
(#37400754)
They discuss averages though. What is likely happening is a convergence on the mean, and a pulling in of the tails. The stars (or the stars at negotiating) are likely making less in both scenarios, and the disproportionately low wage earners are making more, while the middle of the distribution is unaffected. (No proof of this forthcoming just conjecture)
"We find that in markets with high individual bargaining power (low unionization rates), pay transparency mandates lower average wages around 2%, as we find in the context of the U.S. private sector. In markets with low individual bargaining power (high unionization rates), pay transparency mandates have little to no effect on wages."
This seems to not be an argument against pay transparency so much as it's an argument for unionization. Transparent prices in any market are important for market efficiency, and that's no less true for the labor market. The mechanism for decreasing wages is "employers resist issuing individual raises because they think everyone else will want a raise too", and that's a cultural thing that will pass in a few generations. I have worked on teams with plenty of people who made more than me, and I didn't take it personally because I knew full well how brilliant and hardworking they were.