News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learn Physics with Functional Programming by acchow on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @04:33PM (#37397327)
> the language itself is not that complicated

I find Haskell quite complicated, involving abstract concepts you would likely not consciously encounter in other languages (lenses, monad transformers, free monads, etc).

Re:Learn Physics with Functional Programming by nequo on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @05:30PM (#37398025)
Lenses and monad transformers are libraries, not part of the language. It doesn't look like the book uses them, so you don't need to understand them in order to follow it:

https://nostarch.com/learn-physics-functional-programming

Re:Learn Physics with Functional Programming by itishappy on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @09:28PM (#37400281)
It doesn't need to be.

You can do so much with just data declarations and typeclasses.

https://www.simplehaskell.org/

(disclaimer: not a huge fan of the sight design, but I fully support the concept)