News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by mahmud on Thursday March 22, 2012 @10:08AM (#3739714)
It's illegal in France to deny an atrocity acknowledged by the State. If the government calls something genocide or a heinous crime, it's illegal for a citizen NOT to agree. It was meant to reign in holocoust deniers, making it illegal. Then it was used as a political pawn against Turkey, viz Ottoman crimes against Armenians.

In Britain two women are in court demanding their right to wear a cross to work.

In Germany it's even illegal to salute the German flag, or borders on social taboo.

Europe .. it's fucked, but it's better than the U.S.

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by arcaseus on Thursday March 22, 2012 @11:34AM (#3740162)
The law making it illegal to deny the Armenian genocide has been invalidated by the constitutional council. The decision is quite interesting actually: - It is right to forbid denying the holocaust, as it has been recognised by an international jurisdiction (the Nuremberg court) - But it is wrong to forbid the Armenian genocide because it has been declared a genocide directly by the French government, so it could be used to censor anything. It seems a weird choice to me(I'm French), but it makes some sense. (http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionne... -- in French legalese)

Also, free speech isn't absolute even in the US, for example I think you must also have libel laws.

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by coward_anon on Friday March 23, 2012 @06:32AM (#3744484)
How can it be right to forbid denying anything whatsoever? That is thought crime pure and simple. Just because an "international jurisdiction" "recognised" it, doesn't mean a) they got it right and b) new evidence may not come up thus calling for a re-assessment of the whole thing. History is science, nothing is undeniable in science.
Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by rmc on Thursday March 22, 2012 @11:54AM (#3740283)
In Britain two women are in court demanding their right to wear a cross to work.

Presume you're talking about this ( http://www.rt.com/news/uk-bans-wearing-cross-317/ ). This touches on religion, and whether the state wants to have a very multicultural/multiethnic workplaces, the wearing of overt religious iconography from one group can hinder that.

(Tis quite funny how the UK with an established state religion can be quite secular)

In Germany it's even illegal to salute the German flag, or borders on social taboo.

Probably depends on how you salute it. ;) One thing to remember in Europe, unlike the USA, there isn't as much flag waving or similar nationalistic stuff, unless there's a sporting match on. From seeing photos of the USA it looks like it's not uncommon for private citizens to have American flags outside. Here, if there isn't a sporting match on, it's either government buildings, or far right nationaists who habitually use their national flag. So behaviours that seem OK in USA, might seem weird in EU.

Some of this silly things are due to problems europe has had in the past (like religious persecution or extreme right wing nationalism)

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by Schlaefer on Thursday March 22, 2012 @10:33AM (#3739840)
> In Germany it's even illegal to salute the German flag, or borders on social taboo.

Either it's illegal or a social taboo. And to my knowledge neither of them are true.

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 22, 2012 @01:43PM (#3740974)
It's taboo to be overly nationalistic, e.g. fly the flag on a private residence year-round.
Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by Schlaefer on Thursday March 22, 2012 @04:28PM (#3741802)
Usually you wont find a flag pole on private property in the cities and it's clearly far, far, far, far, far away from e.g. US levels of showing the flag, but it's hard to picture a Schrebergartenkolonie[1] without a german flag (even the wikipedia picture show one: [2]). Same is true for private properties where flag poles are more common (rural or costal regions).

I agree it's not a custom, but it's not definitely no taboo.

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotment_(gardening)#Germany

[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kleingaerten.jpg

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 22, 2012 @04:38PM (#3741867)
"The German flag, long weighted by the country's postwar reluctance about open displays of national pride, is flying again, an expression of exuberance as Germany plays host to the World Cup" [1]

Looks like times have changed recently.

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/world/europe/18germany.htm...

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by jacoblyles on Thursday March 22, 2012 @12:26PM (#3740506)
>Europe .. it's fucked, but it's better than the U.S.

Not when it comes to free speech!

Re:France announces crackdown on people reading extremist We... by J3L2404 on Thursday March 22, 2012 @11:50AM (#3740251)
In the US any politician proposing to ban access to certain opinions would be run out of town on rail, and rightly so.