Re:Amazon and Uber Eats Drivers Capturing Residents in Photo...
by raverbashing on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @03:47PM
(#37396835)
If your want privacy put up a curtain, they're just doing their job
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon and Uber Eats Drivers Capturing Residents in Photo...
by notinthegovt on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @04:25PM
(#37397226)
great recommendation; i didn’t think of that. putting up a curtain and sitting in darkness to avoid privacy. living in California, this is considered an invasion of privacy. California’s “invasion of privacy” statute (Penal Code Section 647(j)).
Re:Amazon and Uber Eats Drivers Capturing Residents in Photo...
by codingdave on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @06:53PM
(#37398927)
Are you referring to 647(j)(1), 647(j)(2), 647(j)(3), or 647(j)(4)?
You really might want to re-read the code. It isn't as applicable to your story as you seem to feel:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...
Re:Amazon and Uber Eats Drivers Capturing Residents in Photo...
by raverbashing on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @03:44AM
(#37402355)
Thanks for the link
647j even contains the provision "with the intent to invade the privacy of a person or persons inside"
Doesn't look like this is what's happening here
Also "putting up a curtain and sitting in darkness" because a light control or light mesh curtain blocks 100% of light, sure