That is to say, Cruise is still on the hook, even if they didn’t hit the pedestrian in the first place.
It could be a stalled car, or a fallen tree.
People get overly concerned with blame attribution, and future prevention, when there is often no fault to begin with.
It’s akin to starting a witch hunt after the bad harvest.
SFFD is highlighting to people who live/work/visit SF that so called "AV" taxis are getting in their way. That they were able to move another vehicle to get the ambulance on its way is immaterial. They are saying that in a different set of circumstances where they can't, this car blocks the ambulance. That's the problem, that's the fault.
Your comment sounds like throwing a ladder on the freeway, but you vigilantes better not stop traffic to clear it, no one has hit it. Yet.
That's a big statement. It sounds like it delayed the ambulance up to 90 seconds. 90 seconds can make a difference, but the patient died "later," and from pretty severe injuries.
It’s very likely both are true: Cruise made things more difficult, but didn’t cause enough of an issue to materially change the outcome.
Source: https://sfstandard.com/2023/09/01/person-dies-cruise-robotax...
I don't think the Cruise made this situation better, but it was a human-driven car that caused the death. And as far as I could find, Cruise has never hit a human.