Re:Driverless cars may already be safer than human drivers
by shagie on Friday September 01, 2023 @10:52PM
(#37358196)
It's not the utility that I have issue with. It's the claim "driverless cars may already be safer than human drivers" because it leaves out the criteria.
I'll accept "driverless cars may already be safer than human drivers when driving in urban conditions in San Francisco or Phoenix."
No problem.
The unqualified statement however - I haven't seen anything saying (or even attempting to claim) that it is safer than humans when driving in Minneapolis at 5pm on December 1st, 2023.
I'm still waiting for the unqualified statement to be attempted to even see if it holds up.
I'll accept "driverless cars may already be safer than human drivers when driving in urban conditions in San Francisco or Phoenix."
No problem.
The unqualified statement however - I haven't seen anything saying (or even attempting to claim) that it is safer than humans when driving in Minneapolis at 5pm on December 1st, 2023.
I'm still waiting for the unqualified statement to be attempted to even see if it holds up.