Re:*@gmail.com
by richardw on Thursday August 31, 2023 @12:21PM
(#37339688)
Thanks for checking.
One person is x.yz@gmail. Tens of times I’ve had people or systems strip the x, I am y.z and get their mail. Invites to funerals. Business mail. Admittedly reduced lately, he probably uses it less.
One professor has a “t” in his name, so “ytz”. People miss the t and send to yz. Dot gets ignored so I get those. I get assignments, or people pleading for extensions. That’s stopped over time.
The stuff is important so I tried hard to get it to the right person. But a bounce to the sender would have been better. It’s a bit wearying to be a post forwarder.
Much of the spam I get is to yz. Some makes it through. I’ve never used that version, ever. Many of the mistakes get sent to that version too. I tried setting a rule to block that version because it’s definitely not for me, but no go. I’ve had the address since the earliest intro-only days so it’s had time to add crud. I just checked spam now. First 4 messages were to “yz”.
One person is x.yz@gmail. Tens of times I’ve had people or systems strip the x, I am y.z and get their mail. Invites to funerals. Business mail. Admittedly reduced lately, he probably uses it less.
One professor has a “t” in his name, so “ytz”. People miss the t and send to yz. Dot gets ignored so I get those. I get assignments, or people pleading for extensions. That’s stopped over time.
The stuff is important so I tried hard to get it to the right person. But a bounce to the sender would have been better. It’s a bit wearying to be a post forwarder.
Much of the spam I get is to yz. Some makes it through. I’ve never used that version, ever. Many of the mistakes get sent to that version too. I tried setting a rule to block that version because it’s definitely not for me, but no go. I’ve had the address since the earliest intro-only days so it’s had time to add crud. I just checked spam now. First 4 messages were to “yz”.