Re:Compiling Rust for .NET, using only tea and stubbornness
by gwbas1c on Thursday August 31, 2023 @11:05AM
(#37338309)
As much as I like C#, every time I'm on the job market, I end up taking a job in C#.
Rust's biggest advantage over C# is that it's framework-free. IE, you compile a working executable; nothing more is required.
What's harder to understand is: Will I be more productive using Rust compared to C#? (After dealing with the learning curve.) Will my code be "faster enough" to lower the cost of operations? (IE, a cluster of 5 servers instead of 15?)
Rust's biggest advantage over C# is that it's framework-free. IE, you compile a working executable; nothing more is required.
What's harder to understand is: Will I be more productive using Rust compared to C#? (After dealing with the learning curve.) Will my code be "faster enough" to lower the cost of operations? (IE, a cluster of 5 servers instead of 15?)