News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Swedish cities hit by four residential explosions in an hour by dathinab on Thursday August 31, 2023 @08:14AM (#37335977)
but how do you avoid people only reading the title and getting a very different picture if not by carefully formulating it

they should have called it that _in_ the article

but due to the very unhealthy way ton of people consume articles (title only) title have to be written with a lot of care

Re:Swedish cities hit by four residential explosions in an hour by nonethewiser on Thursday August 31, 2023 @08:25AM (#37336096)
> but how do you avoid people only reading the title and getting a very different picture

Thats what happened with “residential explosion.”

Re:Swedish cities hit by four residential explosions in an hour by dathinab on Thursday August 31, 2023 @10:17AM (#37337514)
you could say it's always happening

headlines are "<censored cursing>"

But shouldn't we then prefer the lest sensational variant, we are so swamped with bad news all the time that at least for external (i.e. country far away, likely not going to affect the country the news is for) things if I had the choice between two attention grabbing similar misleading titles I would always prefer the one which is less painting the picture of "the whole world goes to shit". Because AFIK this kind of misunderstanding produced here is less likely to have further negative ripple effects of people which only saw the headline incorrectly quoting it.

But also I'm living in a country where there is no issue with newspapers constantly downplaying police or citizen violence.

So my preference might differ.

Re:Swedish cities hit by four residential explosions in an hour by dan-0 on Thursday August 31, 2023 @08:47AM (#37336332)
Why stop there? Why not just title it "Four Bombings in Europe?" You wouldn't want to give an unhealthy outlook toward Sweden when bombings happen elsewhere too.

But seriously and respectfully, my point being the title is not accurate to the article. "Residential bombing" is not a real description, it could be aerial bombings, it could be gas leaks, it could be terrorism, or something else.

Context is important. I'm not interested in random bombings. If a foreign nation is attacking Sweden, I want to know everything in real time. If it's an explosion due to a gas leak I'm probably not going to click in and read it, but maybe someone who is interested in public safety or that geographic area will. If it's gang violence, maybe someone with an interest in safety and law enforcement is interested.

"Residential bombing" doesn't tell me enough to make me want to understand it more, it _does_ sound like a gas leak, but I am interested in gang violence in Sweden because it's something I know very little about.

When I have a limited amount of time to read the news, I'm only going to prioritize articles that look like I'm going to get something out of it, I'm not going to read articles with vague headlines. To me that's click bait just like any other.