News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @06:07PM (#37329782)
> I want a bidding system for the H1B slots, paid not just once, but yearly by the companies which hire the H1Bs

I want to eliminate the H-1B (and some other non-immigrant economic visa categories, but the H-1B is the most salient) and instead allow would-be immigrants or temporary workers not admitted under any other visa category but not personally disqualified from entry to get an annually renewable paid self-sponsored work-eligible visa (with lower fees for those eligible but on a waitlist in an immigrant visa category) . If employers want to pay for the cost, they can, but the worker’s visa status won’t be dependent on them.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by jltsiren on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @07:02PM (#37330259)
Annually renewable would be borderline evil.

For some reason, the US is incapable of renewing visas for people who are already in the country. You can renew status, but not visa. If you renew your status and want to travel internationally, you must get a new visa if you want to return. And, for unknown reasons, that can take a lot of time even in trivial cases. Such as when the applicant is already living and working legally in the US.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @11:32PM (#37332144)
> For some reason, the US is incapable of renewing visas for people who are already in the country.

We choose not to prioritize and allocate resources to it (or choose to bureaucratically overcomplicate it given the resources allocated to it).

It’s not fundamentally hard, failure is a choice. And its a choice we shouldn’t make.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by ClumsyPilot on Thursday August 31, 2023 @02:57PM (#37342077)
> If you renew your status and want to travel internationally, you must get a new visa if you want to return. And, for unknown reasons, that can take a lot of time even in trivial cases.

If that's true, you couldn't visit your family back home?

Personally, I have spent a lot of energy dealing with partially dysfunctional immigration system, I would not be willing to do that again

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by sveiss on Friday September 01, 2023 @12:32AM (#37346821)
You can visit home, but you might end up stuck there.

Leaving the US as a non-immigrant always carries a small amount of risk: CBP can always decide to refuse your next admission, even with a visa. After the recent spate of tech layoffs some H1-B holders have been asked to show recent payslips at the border to prove their continued employment, for example.

If you’re super unlucky (with your citizenship, or even just sharing a name with someone on a list) visa renewals can be delayed by months to years for security checks (“administrative processing”).

There are also some green card routes which require a period where you simply can’t leave the US without abandoning your application, after which you’ll be refused entry as a non-immigrant and will need to do the entire multi-year immigrant visa process from your home company. H1-B holders avoid this, fortunately, but TN holders and tourists who get married and decide to stay can get caught out here.

tl;dr: the US immigration system is actively user-hostile.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by ClumsyPilot on Friday September 01, 2023 @04:27AM (#37348160)
> a period where you simply can’t leave the US without abandoning your application

This is crazy. I would inderdtand if the Gov asked for a million dollars upfront, but this is just pointless abuse and cruelty.

UK has the same shit, if you apply for Permanent Residency you can't leave, and my parents suffered a serious ilness and I couldn't go.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by winter_blue on Thursday August 31, 2023 @07:55AM (#37335788)
Or, you know, you could go the Canadian route--i.e. grant permanent residence to high-skilled immigrants (which lets them become citizens), and not treat immigrants (i.e. granting immigrants permanent residence) as a matter to be viewed with disgust, hatred, callousness, and contempt.

Also, Canada rapidly transitions temporary work visa holders into permanent residents, instead of letting them languish as visa holders without basic rights for decades like the US.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by seanmcdirmid on Thursday August 31, 2023 @08:51AM (#37336380)
And once you get Canadian citizenship, you can make the bigger bucks in the USA under NAFTA (or whatever it is called these days).
Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by DiggyJohnson on Thursday August 31, 2023 @10:51AM (#37338074)
> Or, you know,

This is an obnoxious way of starting a point.

Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by nextaccountic on Friday September 01, 2023 @05:04AM (#37348401)
How so? (I'm not a native speaker)
Re:A serious case for dynamic scoring (immigration) by hotnfresh on Thursday August 31, 2023 @11:12AM (#37338429)
When I looked into it, I found that Canada’s really serious about the high-skilled part (or high-credentialed, anyway). A bachelor’s in CS and pile of experience won’t cut it (in fact, experience can hurt, because being older hurts your score) unless you have already landed a job with a Canadian company.