News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by richbell on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @03:29PM (#37327645)
> go on kf and click a few, there's a ton on there. or just look at their _entire forum_ about a trans-woman named christine chandler, in which they document not only her address, but even have photos of her at walmart, game stores, etc

Chris Chan has been a notorious and divisive figure online long before the existence of the Kiwi Farms. They are arguably one of the most well-known Internet personalities.

Merely referring to them as "a trans woman" throws away a massive amount of context why Kiwi Farms (and many other sites) seems so obsessed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPtLvxO8hs

Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by parl_match on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:22PM (#37328442)
that is such a circular argument. they are a microcelebrity who has spent the majority of their life being intensely tracked and harassed by a small but dedicated community, the majority of which is on kf.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by chonkerz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:27PM (#37328535)
The original name of kiwifarms was "CWCki", and CWC are the initials of their first victim. The entire premise of the site was harassment of a severely autistic person to trigger "funny" reactions. It's beyond gross.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by freejazz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:56PM (#37329005)
What does the person being famous before the site existing have to do with harassment?

Also, what does labeling the person as trans (or anything else) have to do with harassment?

Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by parl_match on Thursday August 31, 2023 @04:29PM (#37343275)
May I ask what your point or intent of these questions is?
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu... by freejazz on Thursday August 31, 2023 @05:57PM (#37344186)
To understand why the poster is asserting irrelevant materials. Is it their confusion or are they being purposefully obtuse. May I ask why you asked me?