Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by parl_match on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:22PM
(#37328442)
that is such a circular argument. they are a microcelebrity who has spent the majority of their life being intensely tracked and harassed by a small but dedicated community, the majority of which is on kf.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by chonkerz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:27PM
(#37328535)
The original name of kiwifarms was "CWCki", and CWC are the initials of their first victim. The entire premise of the site was harassment of a severely autistic person to trigger "funny" reactions. It's beyond gross.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by freejazz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:56PM
(#37329005)
What does the person being famous before the site existing have to do with harassment?
Also, what does labeling the person as trans (or anything else) have to do with harassment?
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by parl_match on Thursday August 31, 2023 @04:29PM
(#37343275)
May I ask what your point or intent of these questions is?
Chris Chan has been a notorious and divisive figure online long before the existence of the Kiwi Farms. They are arguably one of the most well-known Internet personalities.
Merely referring to them as "a trans woman" throws away a massive amount of context why Kiwi Farms (and many other sites) seems so obsessed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPtLvxO8hs